Tuesday, February 28, 2006
Dowd and Gregory
I get so much feedback from left-wing apologists whenever I type the name "Maureen Dowd", that I am making it a weekly requirement. Here's this week's entry:
Maureen Dowd is nothing but a NY socialite attention slut.
Here's a little something extra:
David Gregory is nothing but a DC-based attention stalker.
Tell me how I'm wrong.
Maureen Dowd is nothing but a NY socialite attention slut.
Here's a little something extra:
David Gregory is nothing but a DC-based attention stalker.
Tell me how I'm wrong.
Comments:
<< Home
I would have refrained from using "slut" and "stalker" but I can't argue against your supposition. Whatever else they are, they are certainly ignorant... As defined thusly:
Ignorance-- A lack of awareness
They [Liberals] cannot see beyond their own value/belief system... their philosophical bent. They are so blinded by disdain, and hatred for the opposition that, as a result, Liberalism will one day be the death of Liberalism... it's Ideological Suicide.
Did I just coin a term?
Ignorance-- A lack of awareness
They [Liberals] cannot see beyond their own value/belief system... their philosophical bent. They are so blinded by disdain, and hatred for the opposition that, as a result, Liberalism will one day be the death of Liberalism... it's Ideological Suicide.
Did I just coin a term?
I was careful to narrow the intent of the term "slut", anyway.
What is the definition of "stalker"?
My understanding of the word is that it defines someone who hangs out and terrorizes someone else-seeking to get from them what they clearly refuse to give.
So, "stalker" is appropriate.
I do understand your reluctance to use those words. I don't usually do so unless it is called for-in this case, I think it is.
I wonder why there hasn't been any Dowdites comment on this post? Usually, to blaspheme the name of Dowdy brings swift and brutal rebuff!
Post a Comment
What is the definition of "stalker"?
My understanding of the word is that it defines someone who hangs out and terrorizes someone else-seeking to get from them what they clearly refuse to give.
So, "stalker" is appropriate.
I do understand your reluctance to use those words. I don't usually do so unless it is called for-in this case, I think it is.
I wonder why there hasn't been any Dowdites comment on this post? Usually, to blaspheme the name of Dowdy brings swift and brutal rebuff!
<< Home
